Our Mission
Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.
Navigation
Book navigation
Popular content
Recent comments
- Cant figure it out
5 days 15 hours ago - what?
5 days 20 hours ago - nico vs. gengho debate about
6 days 20 hours ago - depends on settings
1 week 9 hours ago - gengho continues to prove his
1 week 10 hours ago - Never saw the comment
1 week 1 day ago - dude, the debate is over
1 week 1 day ago - replaced buildings?
1 week 1 day ago - This below is my conclusive
1 week 1 day ago - What "hmm"? Don't give me a
1 week 1 day ago
Jones may be on a new PR campaign
I ran across this while doing some background research on Dr. Eugene Mallove, I found an ad for Prof. Jones at the top of this page. http://www.pureenergysystems.com/news/exclusive/2004/ColdFusion_DOE/inde...
The ad takes you to this site,
http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Steven_E._Jones_Solar_Funnel_for_Coo...
Prof. Steven E. Jones (http://profjones.com/index.php?p=about) (of 9/11-demolition fame) presents a method for building a cooking device that is safe and low-cost, easy to make, yet very effective in capturing the sun's energy for cooking and for pasteurizing water. Requires cardboard, tin foil, black paint, and a mason jar.
Open Source Approved
On March 3, 2007, Prof. Jones agreed to allow this technology to be open sourced here at PESWiki. Feel free to help us develop this project, listing materials sources, design instructions and improvements, performance data, and other supporting material.
May Come in Very Handy Some Day
"While this technology might not be practical or feasible in the Western World where affluence abounds, it can make a huge difference in third world regions -- which may someday soon include the Western World if we don't get our act together. Memorize these plans. They may save your life some day." -- Sterling D. Allan, NEC (Mar. 3, 2007)
P.S. I almost wish Mike "Crossing The Rubes I've Conned" Ruppert would sue me for dissing his pulp fiction fantasy that supposedly 'proves that it was (Moby?) Dick Cheney, in the PEOC bunker, with the 'magic' transmitter' who was behind the 9/11 attacks.
agreed
i think a lot of lame demo theories come out of tunneling into a safe 'proveable theory' when really they do the opposit. lead us to an unprovable chinese scrapyard and some old video. i think they are mainly around to look productive and to call no planers loonies so the public stays away. what does it take to get people to look at flight 11?. the real smoking gun of 911 is the lack of boeings. we can prove that. no boeings is the key. people have to get some balls and start talking about the real issues. LACK OF BOEINGS hijacked by anybody. the answer is right in front of us.
You're right,Ghengis
The idea that "no planes" is "loony" has no real basis - it's just a claim. I think any reasonable person that sees the evidence and hears the argument will say what I did -- duh, how could I have missed that?
That's the cleverest part about the whole 9/11 Psy-Op ....
... the fact that the truth sounds so absurd.
So, therefore, the 'perps' counted on their stage-managed "9/11 Truth Movement" to police itself.
And, of course, they had already done the ground-work over years of carefully analysing, and manipulating, so-called 'human reactions'.
It was all pre-programmed in ... to be "a law-abiding citizen", and by "education", "advertising", "keep off the grass", "observe the speed limits even at 4:00am" etc.
They can make sheeple "want crap they don't really need" ... and pay for it. And smile about it. And love it. (All that is necessary is for it to be brightly coloured, and animate)
They can make sheeple "self-police" in any chosen which-way.
And they knew all this. And they knew they had the Media sewn up. So they knew they could get away with 9/11 because, if a few discovered the truth, the Truthlings would swarm and self-suppress it.
At the risk of self-importance, I once again offer my personal insights
At the end of the day, however, it's a question of numbers. And everyone who actually looks at the evidence is thereby captured (captivated).
And will remain so. Because, once you know, you can't 'unknow'. That's why the word 'unknow' doesn't exist ('forgetting' is not the same thing!).
And, one thing is for sure. We have no idea how many there are who have, in fact, looked at the data, and 'know'. That's because so many do not have the confidence in themselves (it has been obliterated by the methods I outlined above) to make their position publicly known.
We have more support than you may think.
Which is why it is a waste of time, to spend time, arguing with the few Trolls we inevitably get here. The best they can do is to waste your time arguing with them, so the best thing to do would be to post a standard reply "It is obvious that you are a Troll, and we will treat your post with the disdain it deserves" ... and let that be the one & only reply (no matter how loud they squeal, taunt, etc. That way they can't claim to be censored, just obviously ignored for the Trolls they are).
... and there's more, of course.
Just a remonder: Everything you post here (and everywhere else!) goes through a Psychological Analysis program. That way they can find out what, precisely, gets 'under your skin'.
So they know how to provoke you ... each ... independently.
Which is why the Troll response, above, is the way to go. It gives very little, if anything, away. All you need to do is to ignore the taunts.
People who are not yet aware
I just wish you wouldn't go on about 'sheeple', it sounds so patronising and arrogant. I was put off looking into TV fakery for a while, as it seemed that 'no-planers' were just insulting those who didn't agree with them as morons in the same way that Albanese-types do. Now that I've got past that barrier I can see that terms like 'plane-huggers' are a kind of shorthand, but I still think being so abrasive doesn't actually help. We're all human, being called a moron because you don't take this view tends to make people's rational brain shut down in a cloud of red mist.
'Sheeple' is meant to patronise ...
... because that's what they are.
If someone doesn't like being called it ... that's just too bad. The truth doesn't run by 'democratic vote', or by 'preference', or by 'panels', or by 'spin', or by 'PR methodologies', or by any other personal whims.
The truth runs by facts. When sheeple wake up to this they cease to be Truth Goblins, and start being rational. By doing so they earn the right to describe sheeple as we do (or, at least, I and some others do).
And, since we all woke up, and have had as much time, and the same resources, as the little Truthlings, I, personally, do not see why I should make any allowances I would not make for myself. It would not be quite so bad if the real truth was not so blindingly obvious. If there was any significant difficulty ... then maybe some allowance would be in order.
However it is Hard Science. Not Soft Non-Contraversy (a la Jim Fetzer). And it's not a Personality Contest (again, a la Fetzer), and there is no reason to behave as though it is. Not as far as I'm concerned, anyway. You won't get an apology out of me, Madge. (Any more than Jim Fetzer did a couple of weeks ago).
There are TWO kinds of people.
1) Those who are the SOLUTION, and
2) All the rest.
And, if they are not a part of the SOLUTION, then they must be a part of the PROBLEM (by definition). And, therefore, they need to be viewed and treated as such.
If they get upset, they have a way out via the path you took.
too true
but the tide is turning. a lot of people now know and they are stuck with the reality. now that we lost a few straight line truthers , roger and halifaxion, i am one of the biggest truthers on toob, and i am 100% no boeing. i get people taking off the blidfold all the time. i think the thing that is on our side is things like the pod. people sit and try and rationalise what it is. they look at different videos and something starts to click. THE PLANES ARE ALL DIFFERENT. and bam!!. it starts to dawn on them. i am making good headway with people halfway down the rabbit hole. fricken wtc7 has wasted a lot of time.
... back to Ace's post ...
... I think that's the gameplan.
However it doesn't work, in essence, because there is nothing to stop others from compiling indictments idependently (e.g. Jerry Leaphart).
In fact it would almost be funny to watch the faces of the Truthlings as their 'darling' leads them down the pan ... and the truth finally dawns on their addled brains ... to the tune of so many "I told you so's ... but you wouldn't listen! But that's OK! You can now pin all your hopes on your other 'darling', David Ray Griffin ... and find out, evetually, that the same thing will happen! Meanwhile you've let the perps completely get away with it. Weren't you soooooo clever! Well done!"
yeh but
i agree with madge on this one. we all saw on 911 what looked like planes hitting towers and we are smart objective human beings who ended up seeing thru it, but we didn't at first. we have to give other people the same room to discover without scaring them off. it is a VERY BITTER PILL TO SWALLOW. and i think there are a lot of sheeple out there who never will be able to swallow it, but there are a lot who haven't yet, who we can turn round. i think she makes a good point. we don't want to appear like some snooby nerdy in group who have a special language. we are normal people who have made an amazing discovery and we are just like everyone else.